Welcome to ASSET!
ASSET is all about exploring the impacts of potential changes in the way we use the UK countryside for farming. You can use ASSET to compare the ways in which changing the amount of agricultural land and the types of crops we grow affect society and the environment.
In the future, the amount of agricultural land and the way we use it is likely to change. ASSET was built to explore scenarios of these changes at broad national or regional scales. Scenarios are plausible storylines about the future – rather than attempting to predict exactly what will happen, the aim of scenarios is to better understand the range of potential outcomes and trade-offs between different responses. This is important for informing people about the impacts of possible changes and contributes to develop management strategies and policies. The ASSET scenarios are simple, so that they are easily understood and easily explored via a user-friendly interface, to encourage people to explore what different potential futures look like and their impact on key variables.
ASSET uses data and models collated under the ASSIST project. To find out more follow the links on this page to the ASSIST website and source datasets or keep an eye out for #assistagri on Twitter. If you have questions or want to give us feedback on ASSET contact us at ASSIST@ceh.ac.uk. If you’re keen to explore a more complex scenario, or think you have data which would help refine the ASSET scenarios please contact the project.
How does ASSET work?
Read on to find out how ASSET works. We've summarised what the different land cover and crop scenarios mean and given some detail for each of the different variables modelled under ASSET. There is also a guided tour function in ASSET to help you get started, and information icons which will help provide more detail within the tool.
What scale does ASSET work at?
ASSET is based on the dominant land cover or crop type per 1km cell. At this scale, we have good data on what is likely to influence where changes might occur and on likely responses to change. Other parts of the ASSIST project are looking at the effect of finer-scale changes in the way we mange land at the field and farm scale.
Which land covers can change?
ASSET allows exploration of three land cover change scenarios:
More agricultural land (arable and improved grassland): Conversion of grassland to arable use and improvement of semi-natural grassland. Likelihood of change determined by the patterns of land use conversion already seen over the 20th century and the suitability of the land for agricultural production
More agricultural (protect SSSIs): As above, but with 100% protection of Sites of Special Scientific Interest such that no land use change can occur within them
More grassland: Expansion of grasslands, such that arable land can become improved grassland and improved grassland can undergo reversion to semi-natural. This scenario is more hypothetical, as there is very little data on areas of the UK which have historically undergone such change
How much change might there be?
ASSET allows exploration of percent increases in the target land use of 5%, 10%, 15%, 20%, 25% and 30% from the current distribution of land use based on the CEH Land Cover Map 2007
What might change about the way we use agricultural land?
ASSET allows exploration of four hypothetical cropping scenarios:
Same as today: Retain the current cropping pattern.
Intensify: Convert all viable areas to simplified regimes dominated by cereals on short rotation. This scenario is likely to maximise both profit and food production, but is also likely to require high agricultural inputs and new technologies (e.g. GM crops)
Diversify: Where possible, convert to systems involving multiple crops in the rotation. This scenario is likely to result from farmers attempting to diversify their operations in order to spread risk, meet market forces or use rotational control of crop pests
Extensify: Widespread conversion to low-intensity systems, including increased spring cropping, overwinter stubbles and rotations including temporary grass and fallows. This scenario could result from a widespread desire for biodiversity conservation or to minimise agricultural inputs
Cropping scenarios were derived by expanding or contracting the relevant mapped cropping classes under the chosen scenario. Baseline cropping data were obtained by classifying the CEH Land Cover® plus: Crops map 2016 into eight basic cropping classes based on the proportions of crop types per 1km square.
What impacts on society and the environment can ASSET model?
ASSET currently models a range of variables on which changes in the extent and use of agricultural land might have an impact. ASSET will continue to be updated so check back to see if more variables have been added.
Total calorific value (millions of Kilocalories) from arable crops and livestock pastures, estimated from Farm Business Survey, AHDB, Composition of Foods Integrated Dataset and FAO data. Values averaged over 2015-2017. This is an indication of change in food production under the chosen scenario.
Total income (Millions of pounds) from arable crops and livestock pastures, estimated from Farm Business Survey and AHDB data. Values averaged over 2015-2017. This is an indication of economic impact of the chosen scenario.
Total stored topsoil carbon (millions of tonnes) modelled from Countryside Survey soil samples. This is an indication of the impact of the chosen scenario on carbon storage.
Total tonnage (kilotonnes per year) of nitrogen entering watercourses from diffuse sources (i.e. runoff). Modelled using the InVEST Nutrient Delivery Ratio model using published data. Nitrogen runoff is important because increased runoff carries increased risks of eutrophication, risks to human health and increased costs of water treatment.
Total tonnage (kilotonnes per year) of phosphorus entering watercourses from diffuse sources (i.e. runoff). Modelled using the InVEST Nutrient Delivery Ratio model using published data. Phosphorus runoff is important because increased runoff carries increased risks of damage to freshwater habitats via eutrophication and increased costs of water treatment.
Average number of pollinating bee species per 10km cell. Derived from species distribution models using BWARS pollinator data. Pollinators are important as they affect yield and quality of some crops and are vital to wildflowers.
A measure of how well connected patches of semi-natural habitats are. Defined as the average inverse distance between 1km cells of semi-natural habitat and the closest 10 other cells. 1 = totally connected (surrounded by other semi-natural cells), decreasing towards 0 as cells become more isolated. Connectivity is important for the viability of species populations as it determines whether they can find new habitat patches to feed, establish territories or find mates.
Natural pest control richness
Greenhouse gas emissions
How was ASSET created?
The land cover change scenarios all used the CEH Land Cover Map 2007 as a baseline, whilst all crop scenarios used the CEH Land Cover® plus: Crops map 2016. All changes were modelled using custom adaptations of the InVEST Scenario Generator tool. Response variables were all modelled from existing data by a variety of approaches (see above). All data are either publically available or used with the appropriate permissions.
Scenarios and output maps were designed and created by John Redhead. Impacts were modelled in collaboration with Gary Powney (pollinators), Taro Takahashi (calories and income), Susan Jarvis and Pete Henrys (soil carbon). The ASSET web interface was designed by Jon Cooper, Rod Scott, Jim Bacon, Mike Wilson, Simon Wright and Mike Brown.
Got a question? For more details on how the scenarios were built and validated, or how an individual response was modelled, contact the project at ASSIST@ceh.ac.uk